From Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture and the Law (Gregg Lee Carter ed., ABC-CLIO 2002).
By David B. Kopel
"Defensive
Gun Use" (DGU) is the actual use of a firearm for defensive purposes against an
immediate threat. The "use" may involve firing the gun, but more commonly, the
"use" amounts to simply brandishing a gun. Scholarly research suggests that the
overwhelming majority of DGUs are "successful"--although whether such
successes are moral legitimate is a subject of controversy. There is a heated
controversy about how many DGUs take place in the
Defensive gun useshould be distinguished from the deterrent effects of firearms ownership; DGUs involve crimes-in-progress, whereas deterrence involves crimes which are never attempted, because the criminal fears that the victim might be armed. Thus, John Lott's More Guns, Less Crime(2d. ed. 2001) which finds that violent crime drops 5-8%, and that mass murders in public places drop about 90%, after the enactment of "shall issue" handgun carry licensing laws, is not really part of the DGU debate, since Lott's research involves deterrence much more than the thwarting of attempted crimes.
The
National Crime Victimization Survey is conducted annually by the
The lowest crime completion rates were found when the victim used a firearm. For example, when robbery victims did not resist, the robbery succeeded 88 percent of the time, and the victim was injured 25 percent of the time. If the victim resisted with a gun, the robbery success rate fell to 30 percent, and the victim injury rate to 17 percent. In fewer than 1% of DGUs did the criminal take the gun away from the victim. Other forms of resistance (e.g., shouting for help, using a weapon other than a firearm), had crime success rates somewhere in-between the non-resistance/firearms resistance extremes. All other forms of resistance had high victim injury rates than did non-resistance or firearms resistance.
Many gun control advocates argue
that DGUs are harmful to society. For example, the
The only national study of how
frequently firearms are used against burglaries was conducted by the Robert
Ikeda and four other researchers for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC). In 1994, random digit dialing phone calls were made throughout the
The CDC researchers found that 6 percent of the sample population had used a firearm in a burglary situation in the last 12 months. Extrapolating the polling sample to the national population, the researchers estimated that in the last 12 months, there were approximately 1,896,842 incidents in which a householder retrieved a firearm but did not see an intruder. There were an estimated 503,481 incidents in which the armed householder didsee the burglar; and 497,646 incidents in which the burglar was scared away by the firearm.
As detailed by
While
the CDC burglary data has attracted little controversy, estimates
of the total number of DGUs is the subject of great debate. The table
below, from
Summary of Defensive Gun Use Surveys
Survey |
Field |
Bordua |
DMI one |
DMI two |
Hart |
|
Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of interviews |
1976 |
1977 |
1978 |
1978 |
1981 |
1982 |
Gun type covered |
Handguns |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
Handguns |
Handguns |
Recall period |
Ever/1,2 years |
Ever |
Ever |
Ever |
5 year |
Ever |
Excluded uses against Animals? |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
Excluded military, police uses? |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
DGU question refers to |
Respondent |
Respondent |
Household |
Household |
Household |
Respondent |
% who used gun |
1.4/3/8.6a |
5.0 |
15 |
7 |
4 |
6.5 |
% who fired gun |
2.9 |
n.a. (not available) |
6 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
2.6 |
Implied number of defensive gun uses |
3,052,717 |
1,414,544 |
2,141,512 |
1,098,409 |
1,797,461 |
771,043 |
Survey |
Mauser |
|
|
Kleck & Gertz |
|
Tarrance |
Police Foundation
|
Area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of interviews |
1990 |
1991 |
1993 |
1993 |
1994 |
1994 |
1994 |
Gun type covered |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
All guns |
Recall period |
5 years |
Ever |
Ever |
1 year |
Ever |
5 years |
1 year |
Excluded uses against animals ? |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes
|
Excluded military, police uses? |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
DGU question refers to |
Household |
Respondent only |
Resp. |
Resp. |
Resp. |
Resp./ Household |
Resp.
|
% who used gun |
3.79 |
8 |
11 |
1.326 |
8c |
1/2d |
1.44 |
% who fired gun |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.63 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.70 |
Implied number of defensive gun usesb |
1,487,342 |
777,153 |
1,621,377 |
2,549,862 |
3,609,682 |
764,036 |
2,730,000 |
a 1.4% in past year, 3% in past two years, 8.6% ever.
b Estimated annual number of
DGUs of guns of all types against humans, excluding uses connected with
military or police duties, after any necessary adjustments were made, for
c Covered only uses outside the home.
d 1% of respondents, 2% of households.
e 9% fired gun for self-protection, 7% used gun to "scare someone." An unknown share of the latter could be defensive uses not overlapping with the former.
Gun control advocates argue that all the above surveys are wrong, and that the only correct figure for DGUs comes from the National Crime Victimization Survey. The NCVS suggests 55,000 to 108,000 DGUs annually (depending on the year). Kleck and other critics respond that the NCVS never directly asks about DGUs (but instead asks an open-ended question about how the victim responded), and that because the NCVS is non-anonymous and is conducted by U.S. Dept. of Justice officials, respondents may be reluctant to disclose DGUs.
Kleck and
David Hemenway have engaged in an extended debate about the validity of Kleck's
figures (and the other surveys) vs. the NCVS. Tom Smith, of the
See also: Self-Defense; Kleck, Gary.
For Further Information:
David Hemenway, "Survey Research and Self-Defense Gun Use: An Explanation of Extreme Overestimates," 87 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 1430 (1997), http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Hemenway1.htm
Robert M. Ikeda, Linda L. Dahlberg,
Jeffrey J. Sacks, James A. Mercy, and Kenneth E. Powell, "Estiminating
Intruder-Related Firearms Retrievals in
Tom W. Smith, "A Call for a Truce in the DGU War," 87 Journalof Criminal Law & Criminology1462(1997): 1462. http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/SmithT1.htm